edaltsis
09-19 08:20 PM
It's not just for finger print, its mainly for the photograph. As you go for the photograph they also take finger print (just right index finger) again for records. I have EAD renewal biometrics appointment end of this month but I went 15 days in advance and got that done.
wallpaper Zelman, alex pettyferalex
caliguy
11-15 01:13 AM
@ vikki76
Good to see you are still around. I like your signature, it looks very similar to mine :)
Lets work together and do something to reduce the citizenship wait time (atleast we can give it a try).
Good to see you are still around. I like your signature, it looks very similar to mine :)
Lets work together and do something to reduce the citizenship wait time (atleast we can give it a try).
NolaIndian32
03-11 11:18 AM
You can deduct medical exam expenses and travel to. That's it according to my CPA.
Again, not sure about this being tax deductible, but what I can share with you is that you should submit a copy of this claim with your Health Insurance company (claims dept) because if you have an annual deductible, the amount spent on this medical exam for immigration will count towards that deductible. If you have already met your annual deductible, then a portion of these expenses may be covered by insurance. You should check with your insurance company.
Again, not sure about this being tax deductible, but what I can share with you is that you should submit a copy of this claim with your Health Insurance company (claims dept) because if you have an annual deductible, the amount spent on this medical exam for immigration will count towards that deductible. If you have already met your annual deductible, then a portion of these expenses may be covered by insurance. You should check with your insurance company.
2011 tattoo alex pettyfer muscle.
prout02
08-27 09:34 AM
Wow.. I wonder what happens to the people whose I-140 have already been approved from NSC. The Alien Registration (A#) number should have PD attached to it. But who can tell how USCIS and its' system really works.
However, the IO lady at Infopass tried looking up my approved I-140 and it's not there. She said they have already closed it. I was too stunned by all these developments. How could they close I-140 while I-485 is still pending approval. She took my case to her boss who also said they are helpless. My A# does not pull up my approved I-140. And like someone else suggested - we might have to call them up for attaching our biometrics too. This system is so screwed up. If we got to do everything, they might as well handover the entire process to us.
However, the IO lady at Infopass tried looking up my approved I-140 and it's not there. She said they have already closed it. I was too stunned by all these developments. How could they close I-140 while I-485 is still pending approval. She took my case to her boss who also said they are helpless. My A# does not pull up my approved I-140. And like someone else suggested - we might have to call them up for attaching our biometrics too. This system is so screwed up. If we got to do everything, they might as well handover the entire process to us.
more...
snathan
08-26 08:46 PM
All thanks for kind comments.
@sanju_dba - Thanks for the link but I do not think the thread you provided is in the same situation as mine.
@roseball - I am kind of surprise from your answer. I do not think it is possible currently(given economic situation) to post a job position and accept 0 applicants. Unless the job description has rare minimum requirements.
Company (Fortune 500) is currently interviewing the candidates and I am hoping the lawyer will be able to build up good case to reject the applicants.
Does anyone of you have information as to how many applicants were applied during your recruitment process? So I will be able to get an idea of that I am not in a exceptional situation.
I would appreciate all your comments.
If lawyer is involved in the recruitment process, its illegal and your PERM become invalid. Yes, as others pointed out if there are any qualified candidates the company can not file the PERM. Thats the law.
@sanju_dba - Thanks for the link but I do not think the thread you provided is in the same situation as mine.
@roseball - I am kind of surprise from your answer. I do not think it is possible currently(given economic situation) to post a job position and accept 0 applicants. Unless the job description has rare minimum requirements.
Company (Fortune 500) is currently interviewing the candidates and I am hoping the lawyer will be able to build up good case to reject the applicants.
Does anyone of you have information as to how many applicants were applied during your recruitment process? So I will be able to get an idea of that I am not in a exceptional situation.
I would appreciate all your comments.
If lawyer is involved in the recruitment process, its illegal and your PERM become invalid. Yes, as others pointed out if there are any qualified candidates the company can not file the PERM. Thats the law.
texcan
09-23 01:08 AM
Sorry to hear about this mess.
Donot worry you will be alright.
Here are my thoughts on some of your questions. If you need more help, donot hesitate to ask.
Good luck.
Submitted I-485 on July 26, 2007 at NSC, case transferred to TSC. On Sep 21, 2007 got back my I- 485 package (from TSC) with remarks:
Questions here:
- Can I submit once again with the copy of I-140 receipt? (Shall I deny this reason saying, notice was there with original application and USCIS overlooked that? :o)
I think you should reapply with required information. It should be ok.
There are some cases on this forum.
- If so, should I send it to NSC (where the I-140 case is pending and I-485 was filed originally) or TSC (from where got back the package)?
IMO it should be TSC. I donot know this one to be honest.
- Should I submit once again with new fees? Or shall I send both the fees and let them decide?
Old fees should be used, this proves you reason, and some other guys on this forum has done so too. - Bank cashier checks produced originally with application on 7/26, are going to void in less than a week from now (90 days void period ends on 9/27 – Ohh! GOD. :D). Should I send new checks now (or) is there any way to extend the void period? (I know, I have to check with the bank. But, does any one already did that?).
Bank cashiers checks will be ok for a period of 6 months ( comment from BOA). IMO you should send fees by check ( personal check), or get cashiers check redone, make sure you keep a copy of old cashiers check before encashing those.
Of course you know that, you can void any cashier check ( not used for purspose) and get the money.
- While re-submitting with TSC, should I need to write special instructions for mail room to forward this case to the officer directly? Had any one done that before or any suggestions for those instructions?
- When I re-submit, should I also send the remarks page along with the application?
I saw somewhere on the forum, where an attorney resubmitted case due to icorrect filing fee issue, and hs did put a big note on package ( DONOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM). Please suggest if any one had such issues and how to proceed.
Donot worry you will be alright.
Here are my thoughts on some of your questions. If you need more help, donot hesitate to ask.
Good luck.
Submitted I-485 on July 26, 2007 at NSC, case transferred to TSC. On Sep 21, 2007 got back my I- 485 package (from TSC) with remarks:
Questions here:
- Can I submit once again with the copy of I-140 receipt? (Shall I deny this reason saying, notice was there with original application and USCIS overlooked that? :o)
I think you should reapply with required information. It should be ok.
There are some cases on this forum.
- If so, should I send it to NSC (where the I-140 case is pending and I-485 was filed originally) or TSC (from where got back the package)?
IMO it should be TSC. I donot know this one to be honest.
- Should I submit once again with new fees? Or shall I send both the fees and let them decide?
Old fees should be used, this proves you reason, and some other guys on this forum has done so too. - Bank cashier checks produced originally with application on 7/26, are going to void in less than a week from now (90 days void period ends on 9/27 – Ohh! GOD. :D). Should I send new checks now (or) is there any way to extend the void period? (I know, I have to check with the bank. But, does any one already did that?).
Bank cashiers checks will be ok for a period of 6 months ( comment from BOA). IMO you should send fees by check ( personal check), or get cashiers check redone, make sure you keep a copy of old cashiers check before encashing those.
Of course you know that, you can void any cashier check ( not used for purspose) and get the money.
- While re-submitting with TSC, should I need to write special instructions for mail room to forward this case to the officer directly? Had any one done that before or any suggestions for those instructions?
- When I re-submit, should I also send the remarks page along with the application?
I saw somewhere on the forum, where an attorney resubmitted case due to icorrect filing fee issue, and hs did put a big note on package ( DONOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM). Please suggest if any one had such issues and how to proceed.
more...
ski_dude12
12-31 08:42 PM
The 240 day grace rule is true. Even my H1 had expired and my H1B extension was pending. I continued to work for a month when my H1B extension was approved.
Wait for the RFE to reach your employer and follow up with them to ensure that they reply to it on time.
Yes, I did it, my H1B and I-94 expired in Feb 08 , company filed the extension 10 days before that, got the approval in July 08. I was working all along. As I mentioned, apparently USCIS gives 240 days of grace period once an extension is fiiled during which the beneficiary can stay/work legally and they expect to have a decision on your extension by that time.
The only thing once needs to worry is to file the extension before the current visa has expired.
Wait for the RFE to reach your employer and follow up with them to ensure that they reply to it on time.
Yes, I did it, my H1B and I-94 expired in Feb 08 , company filed the extension 10 days before that, got the approval in July 08. I was working all along. As I mentioned, apparently USCIS gives 240 days of grace period once an extension is fiiled during which the beneficiary can stay/work legally and they expect to have a decision on your extension by that time.
The only thing once needs to worry is to file the extension before the current visa has expired.
2010 alex pettyfer and dianna agron tattoo. Dianna Agron and Alex Pettyfer
GKBest
11-07 07:38 PM
08/13/07.
Was your FP appointment a "Code 3"? I managed to get a infopass appointment on Nov 14th(more than 90 days from receipt date) just to be on the safe side. Lets see what happens.
I think adults (14 and above) have Code 3 and children have Code 2. Anyway, I have a feeling that they are processing by receipt dates.
Was your FP appointment a "Code 3"? I managed to get a infopass appointment on Nov 14th(more than 90 days from receipt date) just to be on the safe side. Lets see what happens.
I think adults (14 and above) have Code 3 and children have Code 2. Anyway, I have a feeling that they are processing by receipt dates.
more...
perm2gc
12-14 03:26 AM
"EXTRAORDINARY ABILITY" SELF-ANALYSIS
1.
Does my field involve the sciences, art, education, business or athletics?
2.
Have I received sustained national or international acclaim in the form of either:
1.
Receipt of a major one-time achievement award (example: Nobel Peace Prize, Olympic Gold Medal, Academy Award)
- OR -
2.
At least three of the following:
1. Receipt of lesser nationally/internationally recognized prizes/awards for excellence in your field;
2. Membership in associations in your field which require outstanding achievements in your field as judged by recognized experts in your field;
3. Publication in major, recognized publications about you and your work in your field;
4. Participation as a judge of others in your field;
5. Major original contributions to your field;
6. Authorship of scholarly articles in your field published in major publications;
7. Display of your work in exhibitions or showcases;
8. Playing critical role for distinguished organizations;
9. Commanded very high salary compared to others in your field;
10. Commercial success in the performing arts.
3.
Can I provide extensive documentation of these minimum requirements?
4.
Am I entering the U.S. to continue working in my area of extraordinary ability?
5.
Will my entry into the U.S. substantially benefit the country?
If you can meet these requirements, you may be able to successfully file an EB-1 petition. If you do not meet these minimum requirements, don't worry, all is not lost. The NIW category offers many advantages to the traditional labor certification process. Accomplishments just a little short of "extraordinary" will certainly appear exceptional as part of your National Interest Waiver petition.
EXCEPTIONAL ABILITY (NIW) SELF-ANALYSIS
1.
Is your field within the areas of sciences, arts or business?
2.
Can you present evidence of at least 3 of the following?
1. A degree related to the are of exceptional ability (preferably a higher degree than most others in your position);
2. Evidence in the form of letters form employers that you have at least 10 years of experience in your field;
3. A license to practice in your field;
4. Evidence that you have commanded a salary higher than others in your field;
5. Membership in professional associations;
6. Recognition for significant contributions to your field.
This list is not exhaustive. Recent changes in the law have made it more difficult for persons to qualify for the National Interest Waiver. As such, it is difficult to define exactly what qualifies a person for the NIW or not. It has become a very subjective standard. There are a few main questions that you should ask yourself when completing this analysis:
1.
Do I possess unique knowledge, abilities or experience that set me apart from my peers?
2.
Will I, through the use of this knowledge, significantly benefit my field?
3.
Does my field have substantial intrinsic merit?
4.
Will the benefit I bring to the U.S. be a national benefit?
5.
Will the national interest of the U.S. be adversely affected by requiring me to go through labor certification?
If you have answered yes to these 5 questions, you may qualify for the National Interest waiver.
================================================== ====================================
Certain Multinational Executives and Managers
Some executives and managers of foreign companies who are transferred to the US may qualify. A multinational manager or executive is eligible for priority worker status if he or she has been employed outside the US in the three years preceding the petition for at least one year by a firm or corporation and seeks to enter the US to continue service (in a managerial or executive capacity) to that firm or organization. The employment must have been outside the United States in a managerial or executive capacity and with the same employer, an affiliate, or a subsidiary of the employer.
The petitioner must be a US employer, doing business for at least one year, that is an affiliate, a subsidiary, or the same employer as the firm, corporation or other legal entity that employed the foreign national abroad.
No labor certification is required for this classification, but the prospective employer must provide a job offer and file a petition with the USCIS.
================================================== ========================================
1.
Does my field involve the sciences, art, education, business or athletics?
2.
Have I received sustained national or international acclaim in the form of either:
1.
Receipt of a major one-time achievement award (example: Nobel Peace Prize, Olympic Gold Medal, Academy Award)
- OR -
2.
At least three of the following:
1. Receipt of lesser nationally/internationally recognized prizes/awards for excellence in your field;
2. Membership in associations in your field which require outstanding achievements in your field as judged by recognized experts in your field;
3. Publication in major, recognized publications about you and your work in your field;
4. Participation as a judge of others in your field;
5. Major original contributions to your field;
6. Authorship of scholarly articles in your field published in major publications;
7. Display of your work in exhibitions or showcases;
8. Playing critical role for distinguished organizations;
9. Commanded very high salary compared to others in your field;
10. Commercial success in the performing arts.
3.
Can I provide extensive documentation of these minimum requirements?
4.
Am I entering the U.S. to continue working in my area of extraordinary ability?
5.
Will my entry into the U.S. substantially benefit the country?
If you can meet these requirements, you may be able to successfully file an EB-1 petition. If you do not meet these minimum requirements, don't worry, all is not lost. The NIW category offers many advantages to the traditional labor certification process. Accomplishments just a little short of "extraordinary" will certainly appear exceptional as part of your National Interest Waiver petition.
EXCEPTIONAL ABILITY (NIW) SELF-ANALYSIS
1.
Is your field within the areas of sciences, arts or business?
2.
Can you present evidence of at least 3 of the following?
1. A degree related to the are of exceptional ability (preferably a higher degree than most others in your position);
2. Evidence in the form of letters form employers that you have at least 10 years of experience in your field;
3. A license to practice in your field;
4. Evidence that you have commanded a salary higher than others in your field;
5. Membership in professional associations;
6. Recognition for significant contributions to your field.
This list is not exhaustive. Recent changes in the law have made it more difficult for persons to qualify for the National Interest Waiver. As such, it is difficult to define exactly what qualifies a person for the NIW or not. It has become a very subjective standard. There are a few main questions that you should ask yourself when completing this analysis:
1.
Do I possess unique knowledge, abilities or experience that set me apart from my peers?
2.
Will I, through the use of this knowledge, significantly benefit my field?
3.
Does my field have substantial intrinsic merit?
4.
Will the benefit I bring to the U.S. be a national benefit?
5.
Will the national interest of the U.S. be adversely affected by requiring me to go through labor certification?
If you have answered yes to these 5 questions, you may qualify for the National Interest waiver.
================================================== ====================================
Certain Multinational Executives and Managers
Some executives and managers of foreign companies who are transferred to the US may qualify. A multinational manager or executive is eligible for priority worker status if he or she has been employed outside the US in the three years preceding the petition for at least one year by a firm or corporation and seeks to enter the US to continue service (in a managerial or executive capacity) to that firm or organization. The employment must have been outside the United States in a managerial or executive capacity and with the same employer, an affiliate, or a subsidiary of the employer.
The petitioner must be a US employer, doing business for at least one year, that is an affiliate, a subsidiary, or the same employer as the firm, corporation or other legal entity that employed the foreign national abroad.
No labor certification is required for this classification, but the prospective employer must provide a job offer and file a petition with the USCIS.
================================================== ========================================
hair dianna agron
GrndMasterFlash
04-17 02:51 PM
the judges are stupid, the art sucks, wtf... :P
no just playin', compared to other art shows i would say they judges were pretty fair.
i enter art shows quite often and have seen crap placed above what i think is pure win.
but like thejuggler says "art is subjective"
no just playin', compared to other art shows i would say they judges were pretty fair.
i enter art shows quite often and have seen crap placed above what i think is pure win.
but like thejuggler says "art is subjective"
more...
vs116
02-29 02:29 PM
We dont fill the I-140 # in I-485. Employer / attorney attaches the document. If that was the case we wouldnt have to worry much.
hot dianna agron Alex+pettyfer
scm303
09-10 09:56 AM
My case is NSC-TSC-NSC. I-485 applied in NSC in July 07, transferred to TSC for data entry, transferred back to NSC in 2007. Card production ordered mail today.
Hang in there and open a SR if you have not done it yet. I think it helps. I opened one on 7th and got approval on 9th.
Hang in there and open a SR if you have not done it yet. I think it helps. I opened one on 7th and got approval on 9th.
more...
house alex pettyfer dianna agron
sam_hoosier
11-28 10:51 AM
That's why I seldom visit anymore
Good for you ;)
Members have a variety of issues that they want to discuss and after the flood of I-485 filings in July/August, EAD/AP is something that a lot of us are dealing with. Just because people are concerned about EAD/AP does not mean they have abandoned IV's bigger goals.
Seriously, chill out ! You can always choose which section of the forum you want to visit :)
Good for you ;)
Members have a variety of issues that they want to discuss and after the flood of I-485 filings in July/August, EAD/AP is something that a lot of us are dealing with. Just because people are concerned about EAD/AP does not mean they have abandoned IV's bigger goals.
Seriously, chill out ! You can always choose which section of the forum you want to visit :)
tattoo Alex Pettyfer And Dianna Agron
rockstart
06-25 09:15 AM
I take this as a step in the right direction. Least USCIS is thinking of helping people. The very people who need help desperately. I can understand the agony and frustration of other people who are waiting for over a year to see their I140 getting approved. But if you think practically what can we acheive with 140 getting approved our 485 applications (for people with 140 pending) are good 2-3 years away (least) I am not talking about substitute cases filed before may 07. So only consolation for us is that with 140 approval we are one step closer to the GC dream other than that the wait does not stop us from working or doing things we were planning to do. If you work for a financially strong company you can use your EAD without any worries since they can answer any A2P queries easily.
more...
pictures alex pettyfer and dianna agron tattoo. Alex-pettyfer-dianna agron
valuablehurdle
06-13 02:03 PM
Fees will be the same.
dresses Alex+pettyfer+tattoo+dianna+agron
giddi_raja@yahoo.com
08-01 04:46 PM
It was already more than 4 years that I have been waiting for my priority dates to become current. If I go with AOS at this stage, definitely it will take 2-3 years for me to get the green card. Becuase the the case needs to be transfered from consulate to NVC and then from NVC to USCIS.
I do not know what to decide. I have my I-94 till Nov'2007 and my wife needs to travel to India. I will try to go to consulate if my interview falls before Nov'2007, otherwise I need to go with AOS process though it takes longer time. Mean while, AOS may end my consular if USCIS requests the case from NVC soon.
I have seen some people who switched their cases from consular to AOS. Their cases were delayed and they were able to obtain the green cards only after 3-4 years from switch date. Some websites wrote that it takes 120 days to get the case transfered from NVC to USCIS, but my case is not at NVC now, it has gone to Consulate, abroad.
My question is, when USCIS initiates the case request from NVC?, is it when I receive a I-485 receipt? or when my priority date becomes current?. The request happens asIt happens as follows.
1- USCIS requests NVC for the case to be transfered from NVC to USCIS
2- Since it was already gone to Consulate, abroad, NVC sends the request to Consulate, abroad.
3- Once NVC receives it from Consulate, then it sends it to USCIS.
4- If USCIS initiates the case request when they generate the i-485 receipt, then it would be ok so that we can minimize the delay in the case process, but if they initiate the case request when the priority date become current, it will be a long process. Because we do not know when the dates will become current again. In any way it will be a long process with the large volume of applications.
One more point, why the consulate needs to wait for the priority date to become current for the interview to be setup?. NVC will send the case to consulate only when Department of State assigns a Visa number to it. So when there is a visa number tied to your case, I don't think consulate needs to wait for any priority date. They can setup the interview at their convenience, correct me if I am wrong. I just searched the visa appointments at Mumbai consulate for August. There are some appointments for EB3 category. That indicates that DOS assigns visa numbers to the cases, then only they will be forwarded to embassy, abroad. Correct me if I am wrong.
Please pass on your ideas/suggestions. Appreciate your ideas and analysis. Thanks!
I do not know what to decide. I have my I-94 till Nov'2007 and my wife needs to travel to India. I will try to go to consulate if my interview falls before Nov'2007, otherwise I need to go with AOS process though it takes longer time. Mean while, AOS may end my consular if USCIS requests the case from NVC soon.
I have seen some people who switched their cases from consular to AOS. Their cases were delayed and they were able to obtain the green cards only after 3-4 years from switch date. Some websites wrote that it takes 120 days to get the case transfered from NVC to USCIS, but my case is not at NVC now, it has gone to Consulate, abroad.
My question is, when USCIS initiates the case request from NVC?, is it when I receive a I-485 receipt? or when my priority date becomes current?. The request happens asIt happens as follows.
1- USCIS requests NVC for the case to be transfered from NVC to USCIS
2- Since it was already gone to Consulate, abroad, NVC sends the request to Consulate, abroad.
3- Once NVC receives it from Consulate, then it sends it to USCIS.
4- If USCIS initiates the case request when they generate the i-485 receipt, then it would be ok so that we can minimize the delay in the case process, but if they initiate the case request when the priority date become current, it will be a long process. Because we do not know when the dates will become current again. In any way it will be a long process with the large volume of applications.
One more point, why the consulate needs to wait for the priority date to become current for the interview to be setup?. NVC will send the case to consulate only when Department of State assigns a Visa number to it. So when there is a visa number tied to your case, I don't think consulate needs to wait for any priority date. They can setup the interview at their convenience, correct me if I am wrong. I just searched the visa appointments at Mumbai consulate for August. There are some appointments for EB3 category. That indicates that DOS assigns visa numbers to the cases, then only they will be forwarded to embassy, abroad. Correct me if I am wrong.
Please pass on your ideas/suggestions. Appreciate your ideas and analysis. Thanks!
more...
makeup stern tattoo dianna agron
hebron
04-21 01:12 PM
Hi,
How do I check if there is an LUD on my case?
PD: Sep 2004 (EB3 India)
I-140 approved
I-485 applied
How do I check if there is an LUD on my case?
PD: Sep 2004 (EB3 India)
I-140 approved
I-485 applied
girlfriend Alex Audiology Tattoos
mbartosik
06-15 01:44 AM
An option may be to pay for expedited H1B approval $1000 as I recall. Then she can get visa stamp, and return and file I485. If the queue for visa stamp is too long in India and they won't expedit, she could try going somewhere else like Bangkok. It may still take a couple of weeks to get visa stamp somewhere else.
Also check USCIS processing times, if your H1B approval is very close to the current processing time you might not want to pay to $1000 to expedite if you can.
Also check USCIS processing times, if your H1B approval is very close to the current processing time you might not want to pay to $1000 to expedite if you can.
hairstyles Alex+pettyfer+tattoo+dianna+agron
GC_Aspirant101
10-06 10:32 PM
I need to know answer for your question as well. My understanding is that EAD will be activated only when you submit I-9 form. getting SSN using EAD doesn't take one to "Adjustment of status pending" status.
Also, as you know , As soon as a H4 holder starts using EAD then H4 becomes invalid. As long as the primary is in valid H1B status, the dependent can fall back to H4 status even if 485 is denied.
Gurus, Please correct me if I am wrong.
GC_Aspirant101
Also, as you know , As soon as a H4 holder starts using EAD then H4 becomes invalid. As long as the primary is in valid H1B status, the dependent can fall back to H4 status even if 485 is denied.
Gurus, Please correct me if I am wrong.
GC_Aspirant101
never_giveup
11-05 03:04 PM
Apologize for being pessimistic, but I was one of those unfortunate ones who watched live, the proceedings of the sub-committee last time, when the visa recapture bill was supposed to be discussed.
They discussed every thing from horse shit to horse killing blah blah blah, but had no mercy on legal immigrants. Even if they had half of the concern they had about euthanizing the horses, many of us wud be greened !!!!
And with the number of amendments they introduce, and with the number of committees and sub-committees it has to go thru, before coming up for a vote, I am not very hopeful with any party in power. Bottomline is, they just dont care, as we dont count for them.
Unless a miracle happens, this will not be taken up. And btw, this is also not in the top 3 priority list of any party. So stop thinking about it and have fun !!!!
They discussed every thing from horse shit to horse killing blah blah blah, but had no mercy on legal immigrants. Even if they had half of the concern they had about euthanizing the horses, many of us wud be greened !!!!
And with the number of amendments they introduce, and with the number of committees and sub-committees it has to go thru, before coming up for a vote, I am not very hopeful with any party in power. Bottomline is, they just dont care, as we dont count for them.
Unless a miracle happens, this will not be taken up. And btw, this is also not in the top 3 priority list of any party. So stop thinking about it and have fun !!!!
idd
09-14 09:26 PM
:P